DALLAS FIRE FIGHTERS ASSN. ET AL.

v.

CITY OF DALLAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Fiore v. White, 531 U.S. 225 (U.S. 2001)
  …of Appeals said, “state courts are under no [federal] constitutional obligation to apply their decisions retroactively [*228].” Id., at 222. We granted certiorari to determine whether Fiore’s conviction was inconsistent with the Due Process Clause. 526 U. S. 1038 (1999). II Because we were uncertain whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision change in the law of Pennsylvania, we certified the following question to that court: “Does the interpretation of Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 35, § 6018.401(a) (Purdo…
• Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Wis. Sys. v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (U.S. 2000)
  …762, 769 (1975) (en banc), with Smith v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 4 Cal. 4th 843, 862-863, 844 P. 2d 500, 513-514, cert. denied, 510 U. S. 863 (1993). These conflicts, together with the importance of the issue presented, led us to grant certiorari. 526 U. S. 1038 (1999). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. [*229] HH I — i It is inevitable that government will adopt and pursue programs and policies within its constitutional powers but which nevertheless are contrary to the profound beliefs and s…
• Rebel Enters., Inc. v. Palm Beach Sheriff, 299 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …purpose of going to the scene to solicit business. . The State of Florida has also addressed the preemption issue in its amicus brief. . We also acknowledge R.Mayer of Atlanta, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 158 F. 3d 538 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038, 119 S.Ct. 1334, 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999), a case which held that 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1) expressly preempts certain ordinances enacted by the City of Atlanta, Georgia. Without commenting on R.Mayer's conclusions with respect to preemption, we do not…