SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
CLYDE G. WEST, APPELLEE
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
CLYDE G. WEST, APPELLEE
242 So. 2d 156
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
Interlocutory appeal dismissed. See Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 224 So.2d 797 (Fla.App. 1969) and Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 229 So.2d 275 (Fla.App.1970), cert. den. 237 So.2d 540 (Fla.1970).
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting Chief Judge, and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ-, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Md. Maint. Serv., Inc. v. Vittorio Palmieri and Bertha Palmieri, 559 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…etan Life, 599 F. 2d 1359, 1371 (5th Cir.1979). .Indeed, the plaintiff conceded that, although he had attended Calder many times, he had never seen anyone cleaning in the outdoor seating area on a routine basis. . Gelman v. Miami Elevator Company, 242 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), relied on by the majority, is inapposite. There the plaintiff’s theory was that the elevator company had breached its contractual obligation. Here there is no evidence to support the existence of a breach.…1 / 2
-
Sachse v. Tampa Music Co., Inc., 262 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)…pretrial discovery methods as depositions, request for admissions and interrogatories can be used by the plaintiff to show that there was a maintenance contract between the defendant and another party. Gelman v. Miami Elevator Company, Fla.App.1970, 242 So. 2d 156. We conclude that the complaint stated a cause of action under Florida’s third party beneficiary rules, Gallichio v. Corporate Group Service, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 227 So. 2d 519; Hill v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, U.S.C.A., 5th Cir…
-
Black v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 581 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…d DCA 1989); Davis v. Otis Elevator Co., 515 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1988); Reliance Electric Co., Haughton Elevator Division v. Humphrey, 427 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Gelman v. Miami Elevator Company, 242 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). Gel-man seems to be the genesis of this practice in Florida and it relies on a non-elevator case (Gallichio v. Corporate Group Service, Inc., 227 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)) which was based on a third party beneficiary theory.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Yewell Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 224 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 229 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. Dade Cnty., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)
- Robinson v. Waldrep Dairy, Inc., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)