PARHAM

v.

COCA-COLA CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Housel v. Head, 238 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …ng psychological evidence in mitigation or defense was not unreasonable. Cf. Baldwin v. Johnson, 152 F. 3d 1304, 1314 (11th Cir.1998) (decision not to pursue psychological testing reasonable when petitioner appeared normal to counsel), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1047, 119 S.Ct. 1350, 143 L.Ed.2d 512 (1999); Stephens v. Kemp, 846 F. 2d 642, 653 (11th Cir.1988) (counsel could reasonably stop investigation after one unfavorable psychiatric evaluation). Second, Britt could reasonably have decided to avoid using evi…
• Cabberiza v. Moore, 217 F.3d 1329 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. at 2068. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating prejudice, see Baldwin v. Johnson, 152 F. 3d 1304, 1311 (11th Cir.1998), cert denied, 526 U.S. 1047, 119 S.Ct. 1350, 143 L.Ed.2d 512 (1999), and we find that he has not carried it. The record in this case is devoid of evidence that “show[s] there is a reasonable probability” that an acquittal or hung jury would have resulted had petitioner’s coun…