LYLE A. LYMAN,
v.
R. L. SMITH, I. WALTER HAWKINS, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT VOLUSIA COUNTY, AND PINES REALTY COMPANY, INC., A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS OR PARTIES CLAIMING THROUGH OR UNDER OR FROM SAID CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a bill seeking to cancel a tax sale certificate redemption, holding that the president of a dissolved corporation acting as trustee has authority to redeem tax certificates on property owned by the dissolved corporation.
Yes. The president of a dissolved corporation may redeem tax sale certificates on property previously owned by the corporation because, under Chapter 16880, Acts of 1935, the directors of a dissolved corporation become trustees for any property owned by the corporation and must handle and dispose of it for the benefit of the stockholders.
“May the President of a dissolved corporation redeem tax sale certificates issued against lands of which the corporation was record owner at the time of corporate diss'olution ?”
States the controlling legal question presented by the appeal
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePines Realty Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, was dissolved by gubernatorial proclamation on December 14, 1936. R. L. Smith was president and dir…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tax Deed Issuance cases and more on FLexlaw
The appeal brings for review order dismissing bill of complaint the purpose of which was to cancel the redemption of a tax s'ale certificate which is shown by the allegations of the bill of complaint to have been redeemed by appellee R. L. Smith.
The allegations of the bill show that the record owner of the land was Pines Realty Company, Inc., a Florida corporation which had been dissolved by Proclamation of the Governor on the 14th day of December, 1936, under authority of Chapter 16880, Acts of 1935. The certificate of the Secretary of State attached to and by apt words made a part of the bill shows that at the time of the dissolution R. L. Smith was President and Director of said corporation and that his address was 144 Magnolia Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida.
So,.the bill shows on its face with the exhibits made parts thereof that the record owner was a dissolved corporation of which R. L. Smith, who redeemed the tax sale certificate, was President and Director at the time of the dissolution, of the corporation.
The controlling question is, May the President of a dissolved corporation redeem tax sale certificates issued against lands of which the corporation was record owner at the time of corporate diss'olution ?
Section 770 R. G. S., 985 C. G. L. as amended by Section 9 of Chapter 14572 Extra Session 1929, inter alia, provides:
“Any person or agent of any person, owning or claiming such lands sold for taxes, or any part or parcel thereof, or any interest therein, or the creditor of any such owner or claimant may redeem the same at any time after such sale and before a tax deed is issued therefor, by paying to the *312clerk of the circuit court of the county wherein such land is situated the face of the certificate of sale, or such portion thereof as the part or interest redeemed shall bear to the whole, and interest thereon together with the fee of fifty cents for the clerk of each certificate or part of certificate so redeemed.” * * *
This Section has been construed in Fountain, et al., v. State, ex rel. McCaskill Inv. Co., 94 Fla. 745, 114 Sou. 511; Washbish, et al., v. Elvins, et al., 114 Fla. 575, 154 Sou. 315; Henderson v. Leatherman, et al., 120 Fla. 496, 163 Sou. 310; Messer v. Lange, 129 Fla. 546, 176 Sou 548.
Chapter 16880, Acts of 1935, provides:
“Section 9. The directors of any corporation dissolved under the provisions of this Act shall be Trustees for any property that may be owned by such corporation and shall handle and dispose of the same for the benefit of the stockholders but the corporation as such, after being dissolved, shall have no corporate rights or be authorized to transact any business as a corporation.”
So it is apparent from the allegations of the bill that the redemption of the tax sale certificate was made by a trustee of the property of the dissolved corporation whose duty it was to redeem the same! for the benefit of the stockholders of the record title owner.
We can not see how any amendment of the bill of complaint could have overcome the showing made by the record and certainly there was' no tender of any amendment which would change the necessary result of the litigation.
The order is affirmed.
So ordered.
Terrell, C. J., and Thomas, J., concur.
Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as au-
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beaty v. Inlet Beach, Inc., 151 Fla. 495 (Fla. 1942)…Supp. 1936, the notice of application for tax deed should have been mailed to the directors of the corporation and not to the corporation itself. The contention is well taken. See the cases of McClung v. Hill, 96 Fed. (2nd) 236; and Lyman v. Smith, 137 Fla. 310, 188 So. 337, for an interpretation of the effect of this statute, Sec. 5977 (20) C.G.L. Perm. Supp., 1936. It is jurisdictional that the notice of application for tax deed be mailed to the owner of the property at the time application is made, if t…
-
Perry v. Shaw, 152 Fla. 765 (Fla. 1942)…d corporate returns for the years 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1936, and it was held that a cause of action against such a corporation does not abate because Section 7 thereof excepts judgments against such defaulting corporations. See Lyman v. Smith, 137 Fla. 310, 188 So. 337. Section 9 of Chapter 16880, supra, provides that directors of dissolved corporations . . . shall be trustees for any property owned by the corporation . . . but the corporations as such, after being dissolved, shall have no corporate r…
-
Phillips v. Beamer, 144 Fla. 769 (Fla. 1940)…damage alleged to have resulted by failure of warranty as to variety and quality' of certain bean seed sold by defendant to plaintiff. The judgment must be affirmed on authority of our opinion an'd judgment in West Coast Lumber Company v. Wernick, 137 Fla. 310, 188 So. 357. [*770] So ordered. Affirmed. Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Ci-iapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws…
Authorities Cited
- Messer v. Lang, 129 Fla. 546 (Fla. 1937)
- Henderson v. Leatherman, 120 Fla. 496 (Fla. 1935)
- Washbish v. Ethyl Winifred Elvins, 114 Fla. 575 (Fla. 1934)
- The First Nat'l Bank of Marianna v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction for the Cnty. of Jackson, 114 Fla. 574 (Fla. 1934)