MULL & MULL, PLC
v.
RHONE-POULENC RORER, INC., ET AL.; AND SPECE ET AL. V. RHONE-POULENC RORER, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1999-04-19
Nos. 98-1242; No. 98-1243
526 U.S. 1081 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) v. THE Cnty. Council OF Volusia Cnty., 307 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …’ motion to amend their complaint by adding the endangered leath-erback sea turtle as a plaintiff. We reversed on all issues and remanded to the district court. Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council, 148 F. 3d 1231, 1258 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied 526 U.S. 1081, 119 S.Ct. 1488, 143 L.Ed.2d 570 (1999). We denied the Turtles’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs without prejudice so that the issue could be addressed at the conclusion of the action. On June 7, 1999, the Turtles amended their complaint to inc…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw