CLYDE L. MANESS, APPELLANT,
v.
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LEONA MANESS, APPELLEES
CLYDE L. MANESS, APPELLANT,
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LEONA MANESS, APPELLEES
242 So. 2d 470
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to F.S. § 627.0127(1), F.S.A. The order recites that it is based upon testimony taken before the court. The testimony received was not made a part of the record. Without such a record it is impossible for this court to hold that appellant met the conditions precedent to an award of a fee pursuant to the statute. See Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 294.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tafero v. State, 406 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…e of his trial. That which was known, Tafero’s appellate afterthoughts, earlier found its way into a collateral attack filed on the heels of his unavailing direct appeal. In 1971, we affirmed the denial of that motion to vacate. See Tafero v. State, 242 So. 2d 470 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). . Rule 3.590(a) was later amended to provide for a ten-day period within which to file a motion for new trial. . While Hallman at one point states that the writ of error coram nobis can be issued only by the affirming appellate…
-
Earton David Jones v. Louie L. Wainwright, 252 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1971)…ecided adversely to the petitioner. Jones v. State, 248 So. 2d 517 (3d DCA Fla. 1971). This Court will not reconsider on a petition for writ of habeas corpus those issues already considered and determined by another appellate court. Tafero v. State, 242 So. 2d 470 (3d DCA Fla.1971); Carter v. State, 242 So. 2d 737 (1st DCA Fla.1970); Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So. 2d 577 (Fla.1967); Roberts v. State, 242 So. 2d 191 (3d DCA Fla.1970). As between the state and this defendant, those issues already disposed…
-
McCLUSTER v. Louie L. Wainwright, 453 F.2d 162 (5th Cir. 1972)…der Florida law an issue which was, or could have been, assigned as error on direct appeal cannot constitute grounds for collateral attack through post-conviction proceedings. See, Powell v. State, 244 So. 2d 746 (Fla.App.1st 1971); Tafero v. State, 242 So. 2d 470 (Fla.App.3rd 1971); Bretti v. State, 239 So. 2d 527 (Fla.App.3rd 1970); Peterson v. State, 237 So. 2d 223 (Fla.App.1st 1970); and Albright v. State, 239 So. 2d 641 (Fla.App.2nd 1970). 5. Additionally, the principle of res judicata is applicable in…
Authorities Cited
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Ernestine A. King, 207 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)