IN RE HILL
IN RE HILL
527 U.S. 1002
Supreme Court of the United States (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 513 (U.S. 2000)…peals denied discretionary review. Because the question whether the retrospective application of a statute repealing a corroboration requirement has given rise to conflicting decisions,5 we granted petitioner [*521]’s pro se petition for certiorari, 527 U. S. 1002 (1999), and appointed counsel, id., at 1051. II To prohibit legislative Acts contrary to the first principles of the social compact and to every principle of sound legislation,”6 the Framers included provisions they considered to be “perhaps great…
-
New York v. Hill, 528 U.S. 110 (U.S. 2000)
-
Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (U.S. 2000)…her directly overruled Meek and Wolman nor rejected their distinction between textbooks and other in-kind aid. The Fifth Circuit therefore concluded that Meek and Wolman controlled, and thus it held Chapter 2 unconstitutional. We granted certiorari. 527 U. S. 1002 (1999). II The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment dictates that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” In the over 50 years since Everson v. Board of Ed. of Ewing, 330 U. S. 1 (1947), we have consistently st…