LEO BRAMSON AND MARVIN J. WELFELD, APPELLANTS,
v.
EUGENE A. MCCABE, BERNARD BAGAN, SEYMOUR BAGAN, GEORGE D. SAX, HAROLD H. HARRISON, RAYMOND L. LUTGERT, SHERWIN SHAPIRO, ROBERT H. WINER, MAURICE A. ROSENTHAL, ALVIN W. COHN, SHELDON KAPLAN, ELSON B. CAHN, AND SAMUEL DELEVITT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS OF A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DOING BUSINESS AS CHIGLADES FARMS, LTD., APPELLEES
LEO BRAMSON AND MARVIN J. WELFELD, APPELLANTS,
EUGENE A. MCCABE, BERNARD BAGAN, SEYMOUR BAGAN, GEORGE D. SAX, HAROLD H. HARRISON, RAYMOND L. LUTGERT, SHERWIN SHAPIRO, ROBERT H. WINER, MAURICE A. ROSENTHAL, ALVIN W. COHN, SHELDON KAPLAN, ELSON B. CAHN, AND SAMUEL DELEVITT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS OF A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DOING BUSINESS AS CHIGLADES FARMS, LTD., APPELLEES
242 So. 2d 739
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the record on appeal, and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, it is the conclusion of this court that the appellants have failed to make error appear. Accordingly, the orders from which the present appeals have been taken are affirmed,
Affirmed.
CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Niemann v. Niemann, 294 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)…$92,500. Under the circumstances of this case the wife’s entitlement to a special equity in her husband’s undivided one-half interest in their jointly held property is clearly negated by the holding of this court in Zuidhof v. Zuidhof, Fla.App.1971, 242 So. 2d 739. The only remaining basis upon which this award could have been made is as lump sum alimony. However, the record in this case does not justify an award of lump sum alimony. It is axiomatic that alimony is based upon one party’s need and the other p…
-
Steinhauer v. Lossie S. Steinhauer, 252 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…by the husband with the approval of the wife. From the foregoing we are not convinced that the wife has established the burden of proof necessary to acquire a legal or equitable interest in the husband’s property. Zuidhof v. Zuidhof, Fla.App.1971, 242 So. 2d 739. As Justice Adkins observed, “The unity concept of marriage has given way to the partner concept whereby a married woman stands as an equal to her husband in the eyes of the law.” Gates v. Foley, Fla.1971, 247 So. 2d 40. In Gates, the Supreme Court…
-
Norwood K. Walton v. Walton, 290 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…la.1951, 50 So. 2d 169; Boles v. Boles, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 871; Klaber v. Klaber, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 98; Spears v. Spears, Fla.App. 1963, 148 So. 2d 564; Arrington v. Arrington, Fla.App. 1963, 150 So. 2d 473; Zuidhof v. Zuidhof, Fla.App.1971, 242 So. 2d 739; Black v. Black, Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 775; Calligarich v. Calligarich, Fla.App. 1971, 256 So. 2d 60; McRee v. McRee, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 21; Belcher v. Belcher, Fla.1972, 271 So. 2d 7. Undoubtedly, these authorities stand for the principle…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence