LOWERY ET AL.
v.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.
LOWERY ET AL.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.
527 U.S. 1031
Supreme Court of the United States (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol., 516 F.3d 955 (11th Cir. 2008)…zed the prudence of limiting a private pattern or practice claim to certified class actions. See Bacon v. Honda, 370 F. 3d 565, 575 (6th Cir.2004); Lowery v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 158 F. 3d 742, 760-61 (4th Cir.1998), vacated on other grounds, 527 U.S. 1031, 119 S.Ct. 2388, 144 L.Ed.2d 790 (1999); Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F. 3d 706, 711 (2d Cir.1998). . Under the McDonnell Douglas framework, as described infra, once a plaintiff has established a prima facie case that the challenged employment…
-
Liese v. Indian River Cnty. Hosp. Dist., 701 F.3d 334 (11th Cir. 2012)…deliberate indifference to the strong likelihood that a violation of federally protected rights will result from the implementation of the challenged policy ... or custom” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)), vacated on other grounds 527 U.S. 1031, 119 S.Ct. 2388, 144 L.Ed.2d 790 (1999). But see Delano-Pyle v. Victoria Cnty., Tex., 302 F. 3d 567, 575 (5th Cir.2002) (rejecting deliberate indifference standard). However, since there has been little explication for the conclusion that intenti…