IN RE WALKER; IN RE JOHNSON; IN RE PROCTOR; IN RE NICHOLSON-EL; IN RE WATKIS; IN RE WARREN; IN RE OGUNDE; IN RE TUCKER; IN RE ANDERSON; IN RE PROCTOR; IN RE FALLIN ET AL.; IN RE ROY; IN RE FARRELL; IN RE FRANCIS; IN RE GRADY; IN RE BRANNAN; IN RE SANTO-GARCIA; IN RE BEAN; IN RE MAXWELL; IN RE BARTEL; AND IN RE WALLACE

U.S. | 1999-10-04
Nos. 98-2048; No. 98-9171; No. 98-9311; No. 98-9335; No. 98-9428; No. 98-9503; No. 98-9766; No. 98-9845; No. 98-9917; No. 98-9926; No. 99-57; No. 99-5028; No. 99-5092; No. 99-5135; No. 99-5336; No. 99-5343; No. 99-5383; No. 99-5408; No. 99-5410; No. 99-5474; No. 99-5549
528 U.S. 808 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (U.S. 2000)
    …, costs, and fees totaling almost $1.6 million, together with injunctive relief, see App. to Pet. for Cert. 56-58. The Second Circuit affirmed the denial of the motion for judgment as a matter of law, 165 F. 3d 120 (1998), and we granted certiorari, 528 U. S. 808 (1999). [*209] J — I ! — I The Lanham Act provides for the registration of trademarks, which it defines in §45 to include “any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof [used or intended to be used] to identify and distinguish [a pr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw