MULLIN
v.
RAYTHEON CO.
MULLIN
RAYTHEON CO.
528 U.S. 811
Supreme Court of the United States (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weeks v. Harden Mfg. Corp., 291 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2002)…99), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1069, 121 S.Ct. 756, 148 L.Ed.2d 659 (2001); Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 170 F. 3d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1999); Koveleskie v. SBC Capital Mkts., Inc., 167 F. 3d 361, 365 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 811, 120 S.Ct. 44, 145 L.Ed.2d 40 (1999); Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., 146 F. 3d 175, 182 (3d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139, 119 S.Ct. 1028, 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999), abrogated on other grounds, Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases, 283 F. 3d 595 (3d Cir.…
-
Adams v. Fla. Power Corp., 255 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2001)…n. 2 (9th Cir.1993). In contrast, the First, Third, Sixth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits have questioned the viability of disparate impact claims under the ADEA post-Hazen. See Mullin v. Raytheon Co., 164 F. 3d 696, 700-01 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 811, 120 S.Ct. 44, 145 L.Ed.2d 40 (1999); E.E.O.C. v. Francis W. Parker School, 41 F. 3d 1073, 1076-77 (7th Cir.1994); Ellis v. United Airlines, Inc., 73 F. 3d 999, 1006-07 (10th Cir.1996); DiBiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 48 F. 3d 719, 732 (3d Cir…