JAMES C. BOOZER, SR., APPELLANT,

v.

ROBERT G. BOOZER AND DENOLIS BOOZER, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. The Honorable Paul Baker, 248 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 1971)
  …odman v. State ex rel. Buono, Fla., 243 So. 2d 594, unless the State is able in subsequent proceedings below to demonstrate some rational reason to the contrary. Incidentally, the denial of prohibition in State ex rel. Soodhalter v. Baker, Fla.App., 242 So. 2d 814, by the District Court would not appear to be controlling in this transferred case. I reiterate in conclusion that since our jurisdiction in this matter does not clearly appear, I think it appropriate for the gen [*475] eral policy reasons indicate…
• State of Fla. ex rel. Louis James Williams v. Honorable H. Paul Baker, 248 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1971)
  …the petitioner in accordance with the law as set forth in the opinion. The trial court refused to discharge the defendant and to dismiss the prosecution, purportedly basing its ruling on State of Florida ex rel. Soodhalter v. Baker (1971), Fla.App., 242 So. 2d 814. The latter case merely involved the question of whether this Court could transfer a petition for writ of prohibition to the District Court of Appeal where this Court lacked jurisdiction. It was pointed out that we have jurisdiction .in prohibition…