DR. FRANCIS J. CAMPBELL, APPELLANT,
v.
HENRY H. RUTKIN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was insufficient proof of a breach of a condition precedent in any contract between the parties.
Appellant appealed an adverse final judgment, arguing the trial court erred by not dismissing the case for failure to join an indispensable party and …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Indispensable Party cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant appeals from an adverse final judgment for the plaintiff below, Henry H. Rutkin.
Appellant argues that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to dismiss because plaintiff failed to join the Associated Doctors Hospital, Inc., as an indispensable party to this action.
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal in light of this contention and find it to be without merit.
Appellant’s second point for reversal is based on the failure of an alleged condition precedent in a contract. The alleged contract was in writing but was not signed by either party. There is a receipt dated August 7, 1967 executed by Francis J. Campbell, M.D., in the record. This is the only sufficient evidence of any written agreement between these parties.
We hold there was insufficient proof of a breach of a condition precedent in any contract between these parties. See Premium Groves, Inc. v. Grand Island Citrus Co-op., Inc., Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 551.
The final judgment is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Premium Groves, Inc. v. Grand Island Citrus Coop., Inc., 175 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)