MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING SOUTHEAST, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES; AND MARATHON OIL CO. V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (U.S. 2000)
  …of the [*852] Constitution, Art. I, §8, cl. 3. Courts of Appeals have divided both on the question whether § 844(i) applies to buildings not used for commercial purposes,2 and on the constitutionality of such an application.3 We granted certiorari, 528 U. S. 1002 (1999), and framed as the question presented: “Whether, in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U. S. 549 (1995), and the interpretive rule that constitutionally doubtful constructions should be avoided, see Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gul…
• Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. DOE, 530 U.S. 290 (U.S. 2000)
  …, private, religious speech.11 We granted the District’s petition for certiorari, limited to the following question: “Whether petitioner’s policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Establishment Clause.” 528 U. S. 1002 (1999). We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, that it does. I-H HH The first Clause in the First Amendment to the Federal Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free e…