JACK WESLEY TICE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1971-01-28
No. M-376
JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
243 So. 2d 451 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971) Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Austin v. State, 160 So.2d 730 (Fla.App.1964), and Tice v. Wainwright, Case No. L-282 in the records of this court.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Thomas v. State, 838 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …did not amount to a comment on the evidence which would require a new trial.3 [*1197] The cases cited by the majority, in which new trials were mandated, involve different factual scenarios than the one before us. For instance, in Esposito v. State, 243 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), a state witness had been given a concurrent sentence in exchange for agreeing to testify against Esposito. During cross-examination the defense attorney attempted to show that the sentence the witness received was inconsequential…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw