WOOLLEY
v.
ZIMMERMAN, SUPERINTENDENT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT WAYMART, ET AL.; MCGINNIS V. ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.; LIU ET UX. V. SILVERMAN, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF LIU, ET UX.; BUCKLEY V. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION; WOJCIECHOWSKI V. MONTEVIDEO PARTNERSHIP ET AL.; WOJCIECHOWSKI V. WALT DISNEY CONCERT HALL NO. 1 ET AL.; BUGGS ET VIR V. TISDALE ET AL.; LEE V. HAWAII; KAHRE ET AL. V. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND ET AL.; JEFFERSON V. UNITED STATES; DITTLER V. ROBEY, IN RE WALKER, DAVIS V. MUROV ET AL.; MARTINEZ V. TEXAS; BEETS V. KAUTZKY, DIRECTOR, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JOHNSON V. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ET AL.; CHHIM V. CITY OF HOUSTON ET AL.; VASQUEZ DEL ROSARIO V. RADLOFF ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; COE V. BELL, WARDEN; BISHOP V. ROMER, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO, ET AL.; MORRIS V. CITY OF BUFFALO; MALLETT V. BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; SPEED V. GEORGIA; WASHINGTON V. DAVIS, WARDEN, ET AL.; JACKSON V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CUPIT V. UNITED STATES; CHAPPELL V. EASLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.; GRIFFIN V. BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; WARD V. UNITED STATES; WINZY V. LENSING, WARDEN; TAYLOR V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ET AL.; RAINEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. V. MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ET AL.; FRANK V. ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY; ALLENDER V. UNITED STATES; MULLIGAN V. ASSOCIATES LEASING, INC., ET AL.; ROSENTHAL V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; DASS V. CAPLINGER ET AL.; JACKSON V. TEXAS; TIWARI V. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA ET AL.; YOUNG V. MONTGOMERY CITY COUNCIL ET AL.; PERRY V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; BROADWAY V. SINEX ET AL.; KING V. WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL ET AL.; SCHWARTZ V. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.; ALSTON V. BROWN ET AL.; THOMAS V. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; SEARS V. GEORGIA; YOUNG V. UNITED STATES; FILIAGGI V. OHIO; KING V. UNITED STATES; MASUOKA V. HAWAII ET AL.; RICKERBY V. EVERETT, WARDEN; WHITE V. ALASKA; HUETTL V. WISCONSIN; BATTLE V. BRUTON, WARDEN, ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. UNITED STATES; MILLIS V. UNITED STATES; ALSTON V. NEW YORK; MCBROOM V. BOB-BOYD LINCOLN MERCURY, INC.; BYRD V. TEXAS; WEBB V. WEST, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; CURRO V. KELLY, SUPERINTENDENT, ATTICA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; WORKMAN V. BELL, WARDEN; MORELAND V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; MASON V. CORCORAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; LESLIE V. LITSCHER, SECRETARY, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SHEMONSKY V. UNITED STATES; ALLEN V. UNITED STATES; ORTIZ V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1999-11-29
Nos. 97-5401; No. 98-1810; No. 98-1881; No. 98-1894; No. 98-1924; No. 98-1955; No. 98-1975; No. 98-1982; No. 98-2031; No. 98-2041; No. 98-2047; No. 98-2048; No. 98-7567; No. 98-8002; No. 98-8551; No. 98-9345; No. 98-9444; No. 98-9492; No. 98-9585; No. 98-9606; No. 98-9642; No. 98-9742; No. 98-9789; No. 98-9823; No. 98-9886; No. 98-9892; No. 98-9920; No. 98-9960; No. 98-9972; No. 98-10028; No. 98-10035; No. 98-10046; No. 99-60; No. 99-68; No. 99-103; No. 99-132; No. 99-173; No. 99-176; No. 99-245; No. 99-276; No. 99-281; No. 99-310; No. 99-316; No. 99-385; No. 99-5039; No. 99-5056; No. 99-5079; No. 99-5137; No. 99-5176; No. 99-5196; No. 99-5214; No. 99-5275; No. 99-5308; No. 99-5317; No. 99-5363; No. 99-5402; No. 99-5404; No. 99-5422; No. 99-5509; No. 99-5540; No. 99-5550; No. 99-5603; No. 99-5618; No. 99-5644; No. 99-5658; No. 99-5678; No. 99-5782; No. 99-5985; No. 99-6043; No. 99-6087
528 U.S. 1038 Supreme Court of the United States (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This document is a Supreme Court order denying petitions for rehearing in numerous cases decided during the 1998-1999 term, listing over eighty individual cases with their docket numbers and references to the pages where decisions were published. The order reflects the Court's final disposition of these cases by refusing to reconsider its previous rulings.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

522 U. S. 892; ante, p. 812; ante, p. 815; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 817; No. 98-1955. No. 98-1975. No. 98-1982. No. 98-2031. No. 98-2041. No. 98-2047. No. 98-2048. No. 98-7567. No. 98-8002. No. 98-8551. No. 98-9345. No. 98-9444. No. 98-9492. No. 98-9585. No. 98-9606. No. 98-9642. No. 98-9742. No. 98-9789. No. 98-9823. No. 98-9886. No. 98-9892. No. 98-9920. No. 98-9960. No. 98-9972. No. 98-10028. No. 98-10035. No. 98-10046. ante, p. 819; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 823; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 808; 525 U. S. 1182; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 842; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 862; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 867; No. 99-60. No. 99-68. No. 99-103. No. 99-132. No. 99-173. No. 99-176. No. 99-245. No. 99-276. No. 99-281. No. 99-310. No. 99-316. No. 99-385. No. 99-5039. No. 99-5056. No. 99-5079. No. 99-5137. No. 99-5176. No. 99-5196. No. 99-5214. No. 99-5275. No. 99-5308. No. 99-5317. No. 99-5363. No. 99-5402. No. 99-5404. No. 99-5422. No. 99-5509. No. 99-5540. No. 99-5550. ante, p. .871; ante, p. 871; ante, p. 873; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 930; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 932; ante, p. 932; ante, p. 933; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 884; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 892; ante, p. 895; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 898; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 908; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 910; No. 99-5603. No. 99-5618. No. 99-5644. No. 99-5658. No. 99-5678. No. 99-5782. No. 99-5985. No. 99-6043. No. 99-6087. ante, p. 912; ante, p. 936; ante, p. 913; ante, p. 937; ante, p. 914; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 956; ante, p. 943; and ante, p. 944. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw