PIRELA
v.
PENNSYLVANIA
PIRELA
PENNSYLVANIA
528 U.S. 1082
Supreme Court of the United States (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Caderno v. United States, 256 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2001)…pending sentencing. We review de novo an appellant’s contention that his attorney had a conflict of interests and, consequently, provided ineffective assistance. Mills v. Singletary, 161 F. 3d 1273, 1287 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam), cert denied, 528 U.S. 1082, 120 S.Ct. 804, 145 L.Ed.2d 677 (2000). To succeed on an ineffective-assistance claim based on a conflict of interests, an appellant must show specific instances in the record that “demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affecte…