BENSON

v.

BENSON, IN RE RICE, ALEXANDER V. DOE ET AL.; SKIBINSKI V. BELL ATLANTIC ET AL.; SKIBINSKI V. LAZAROFF ET AL.; MENSAH V. UNITED STATES; MORETON ROLLESTON, JR., LIVING TRUST, ET AL. V. ESTATE OF SIMMS, CHERRY, EXECUTOR; ANDERSON V. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT; WILLMAN V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.; RUIZ RIVERA V. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ET AL.; VEY V. THE UNIVERSE ET AL.; JONES V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; HATTER V. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY ET AL.; FOSTER V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; LONG V. KENTUCKY; JARRETT V. HAYWARD MANOR APARTMENTS ET AL.; CORPUZ V. WALTER, SUPERINTENDENT, AIRWAY HEIGHTS CORRECTIONS CENTER; PERRY V. ZAENTZ ET AL., IN RE LAVERTU, KING V. MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ET AL.; SHED V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; BASS V. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; HEMMERLE V. BAKST; RE V. NEW MEXICO; PALMER V. GEORGIA; TISDALE V. OHIO; GARDNER ET AL. V. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP.; SHOCKETT V. MASSACHUSETTS; PORTER V. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, ET AL.; HAWKS V. CLARK, WARDEN, ET AL.; DEAN V. UNITED STATES; CAMERON V. GARRAGHTY, WARDEN; PATTERSON V. RIVERS, WARDEN, IN RE HARRIS, LEWIS V. UNITED STATES ET AL., IN RE WARREN, IN RE WARREN

Citator

Cited By

• Lightbourne v. McCOLLUM, 969 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 2007)
  …ighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Sims, 754 So. 2d at 668. After this Court rejected Sims’ challenges to the lethal injection protocol, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. See Sims v. Florida, 528 U.S. 1183, 120 S.Ct. 1233,145 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2000). In the same year Sims was decided, this Court decided Provenzano v. State, 761 So. 2d 1097 (Fla.2000) (Provenzano III), upholding lethal injection as follows: [T]his Court [previously] stated that there is…
• Amos Lee King v. State, 808 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 2002)
  …herefore meritless. See Provenzano v. State, 761 So. 2d 1097, 1099 (Fla.2000) (holding execution by lethal injection does not constitute cruel punishment or unusual punishment or both); Sims v. State, 754 So. 2d 657, 666-69 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1183, 120 S.Ct. 1233, 145 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2000) (Florida Department of Corrections procedures for the application of lethal injection do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment). . Claims one, two, three, four, five, six, and eight are procedurally ba…
• Vining v. State, 827 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2002)
  …ng that lethal injection is “generally viewed as a more humane method of execution”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1185, 120 S.Ct. 1236, 145 L.Ed.2d 1132 (2000); Sims v. State, 754 So. 2d 657, 664 (Fla.) (finding no ex post facto violation), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1183, 120 S.Ct. 1233, 145 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2000). Thus, we affirm the postconviction court’s summary denial of this claim. In claim eight Vining argues that he is “innocent of the death penalty” as there are insufficient aggravating circumstances to estab…