FREE ET AL.

v.

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …attributed only to the named plaintiffs. In support of this argument, the parties point to In re Abbott Laboratories, 51 F. 3d 524 (5th Cir.1995), aff'd by equally divided court sub nom., Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 1578, 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000), in which the Fifth Circuit addressed a Louisiana statute authorizing an award of attorney’s fees for “the representative parties ... when as a result of the class action a fund is made available, or recovery or compromise is had which is ben…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Allapattah Servs. v. Exxon Corp., 362 F.3d 739 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …Court’s Prior History With § 1367 A final factor demonstrating that the supplemental jurisdiction question is worthy of the Supreme Court’s attention is the fact that the Court previously granted cer-tiorari on this issue. In Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333, 120 S.Ct. 1578, 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000), the Court granted cer-tiorari to review the Fifth Circuit’s en banc holding that § 1367 overruled Zahn and allowed courts to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over unnamed plaintiffs in diversity-based class…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Guevara v. Republic OF Peru, 608 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2010)
  …without the benefit of factfindings from the district court. Vidal and Rospigliosi may reassert on remand the issue of the district court’s jurisdiction over their persons. Guevara I, 468 F. 3d at 1305-06. . Affirmed by an equally divided court, 529 U.S. 333, 120 S.Ct. 1578, 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000). . International comity is an abstention doctrine. “A federal court has jurisdiction but defers to the judgment of an alternative forum.” Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank AG, 379 F. 3d 1227, 1237 (11th Cir.20…

  ← 1 / 2 →