DICKERSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Green Tree Fin. Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (U.S. 2000)
  …on expenses. On that basis, the court held that the agreement to arbitrate posed a risk that respondent’s ability to vindicate her statutory rights would be undone by “steep” arbitration costs, and therefore was unenforceable. We granted certiorari, 529 U. S. 1052 (2000), and we now affirm the Court of Appeals with respect to the first conclusion, and reverse it with respect to the second. II Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act, enacted in 1988, governs appellate review of arbitration orders. 9 U. S.…
• Flanigan's Enters. v. Fulton Cnty., 242 F.3d 976 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …rdinance prohibiting nude dancing in establishments licensed to sell liquor is content-neutral and therefore, subject to review under the O’Brien test. See Sammy’s of Mobile, Ltd., v. City of Mobile, 140 F. 3d 993, 996 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1052, 120 S.Ct. 1553, 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000). We have subsequently reaffirmed this holding, guided by Pap’s, reasoning that regulations targeting undesirable secondary effects of adult entertainment establishments that serve alcoholic beverages are unr…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Legal Servs. Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533 (U.S. 2001)
  …ded. Id., at 773-778 (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part). LSC filed a petition for certiorari challenging the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that the § 504(a)(16) suits-for-benefits proviso was unconstitutional. We granted certiorari, 529 U. S. 1052 (2000). II The United States and LSC rely on Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U. S. 173 (1991), as support for the LSC program restrictions. In Rust, Congress established program clinics to provide subsidies for doctors to advise patients on a variety of fam…