CARL EUGENE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Peaden v. Julie C. (Peaden) Slatcoff, 522 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …s holding that growth and school changes did not constitute substantial change warranting modification of custody. Collins v. Newton,2 362 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Teta v. Teta, 297 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); and Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, 244 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), citing numerous Supreme Court decisions. Such factual situations are, of course, infinitely variable and subject initially to wide discretion of the trial court in determining the best interest of a particular child. But the case…
• In the Interest of M.J.W. a child, 453 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …the issue preserved for review, appellant has failed to demonstrate error. While the child’s wishes may be a relevant consideration in cases involving termination of parental rights, they are not the controlling factor. See Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, 244 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). And the determination of whether to call the child as a witness in this regard is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. Cf., Dings v. Dings, 161 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). In the present case the trial court indicated…
• Anne Marie Kitchens v. Kitchens, 305 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …bilitative alimony. We have considered these issues and find them to be without merit. For the reasons stated, the orders appealed are affirmed. Affirmed. . See Nixon v. Nixon, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 878; Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, Fla.App.1970, 244 So. 2d 518.…