COE
v.
BELL, WARDEN

U.S. | 2000-04-18
No. 99-9127 (99A859)
529 U.S. 1084 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sanders v. Dooly Cnty., 245 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …seeking injunctive relief to be laches-barred for the reasons that we described above. Cf. Fonts v. Harris, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1351, 1353 (S.D.Fla.1999) (relying on similar laches reasoning to dismiss Shaw claims), aff'd sub nom. Chandler v. Harris, 529 U.S. 1084, 120 S.Ct. 1716, 146 L.Ed.2d 639 (2000). But we do think that the district court overstepped its discretion in judging the claims for declaratory relief to be similarly barred, because the third element of a laches defense — prejudice to the defend…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw