MRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
v.
AT&T CORP.

U.S. | 2000-05-15
No. 99-1480
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
529 U.S. 1124 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Aguiar v. State, 199 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
    …ble searches and seizures”). We hold that the officer can, and recede from F.J.R. v. State, 922 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), which reached a contrary conclusion relying upon Wilson v. State, 734 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), certiorari denied, 529 U.S. 1124, 120 S.Ct. 1996, 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000). We also certify conflict with Wilson v. State, and with several other Florida district court opinions, to be [*922] discussed, that have followed Wilson v. State. I. Aguiar was the front-seat passenger in a…
  • Presley v. State, 204 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …at D824. We concur fully with the well-reasoned opinion of the unanimous en banc court in Aguiar * We also, as the Fifth District did in Aguiar, certify conflict with the case of Wilson v. State, 734 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1124, 120 S.Ct. 1996, 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000), and its progeny. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. * While certain dicta in this court’s case of State v. Y.B., 659 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), can be argued to be in conflict with the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw