HUNT, GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

v.

CROMARTIE ET AL.; AND SMALLWOOD ET AL. V. CROMARTIE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Semtek Int'l Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 531 U.S. 497 (U.S. 2001)
  …rsity judgments is prescribed by federal law, under which the earlier dismissal was on the merits and claim preclusive. 128 Md. App. 39, 736 A. 2d 1104 (1999). After the Maryland Court of Appeals declined to review the case, we granted certiorari. 530 U. S. 1260 (2000). II Petitioner contends that the outcome of this case is controlled by Dupasseur v. Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130, 135 (1875), which held that the res judicata effect of a federal diversity judgment “is such as would belong to judgments of the St…
• Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (U.S. 2001)
  …ad “moved Greensboro Black community into the 12th, and now need[ed] to take [about] 60,000 out of the 12th,” App. 369; 133 P. Supp. 2d, at 420. The State and intervenors filed a notice of appeal. 28 U. S. C. § 1253. We noted probable jurisdiction. 530 U. S. 1260 (2000). And we now reverse. II The issue in this case is evidentiary. We must determine whether there is adequate support for the District Court’s key findings, particularly the ultimate finding that the legislature’s motive was predominantly raci…
• Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (U.S. 2001)
  …rtiorari to consider first whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel extends to crimes that are “factually related” to those that have actually been charged, and second whether respondent made a valid unilateral waiver of that right in this case. 530 U. S. 1260 (2000). Because we answer the first question in the negative, we do not reach the second. The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the aeeused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance, of Counsel for his defence.” I…