STEINHAUSER
v.
HAWKINS

U.S. | 2000-08-25
No. 99-1948
530 U.S. 1293 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Arthur v. Haley, 248 F.3d 1302 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …is the limitations period, the court cannot permit the execution to go forward.”). Under these circumstances, we do not find that the district court has abused its discretion. See Hauser v. Moore, 223 F. 3d 1316, 1321 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 530 U.S. 1293, 121 S.Ct. 14, 147 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2000). Accordingly, the motion to vacate or dissolve the stay is DENIED. . While neither party has raised the issue of whether we have subject matter jurisdiction over this case, we are obliged to address the issue…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw