NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
KENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 2000-09-26
No. 99-1815
530 U.S. 1304 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ly denied the motion and, for the same reason, the Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished, per curiam opinion. Judgt. order reported at 208 F. 3d 819 (CA4 2000). To resolve the disagreement amongst the Courts of Appeals, we granted certiorari, 530 U. S. 1304 (2000), and now affirm. In the United States, parties are ordinarily required to bear their own attorney’s fees — the prevailing party is not entitled to collect from the loser. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240,…
  • …simply] because the nurses have the ability to direct patient care by virtue of their training and expertise, not because of their connection with ‘management.’ ” 193 F. 3d 444, 453 (1999). We granted the Board’s petition for a writ of certiorari. 530 U. S. 1304 (2000). II The Act expressly defines the term “supervisor” in §2(11), which provides: “The term ‘supervisor’ means any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge,…
  • …proper enquiry as going not to a document’s source, but to the role it plays in agency decisionmaking. See id., at 1039. We granted certiorari in view of the decision’s significant impact on the relationship between Indian tribes and the Government, 530 U. S. 1304 (2000), and now affirm. II Upon request, POIA mandates disclosure of records held by a federal agency, see 5 U. S. C. § 552, unless the documents fall within enumerated exemptions, see § 552(b). “[T]hese [*8] limited exemptions do not obscure the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw