CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
v.
PALANK, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF PALANK, DECEASED, AND AS MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND NEXT FRIEND OF PALANK ET AL.

U.S. | 2000-10-02
No. 99-1987
531 U.S. 822 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Humana Health Ins. Co. OF Fla., Inc. v. Chipps, 802 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …ally, [*498] the agreement became relevant for purposes of proving otherwise. This case is distinguishable from CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Palank, 743 So. 2d 556, 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), review denied, 760 So. 2d 946 (Fla.) and certiorari denied, 531 U.S. 822, 121 S.Ct. 65, 148 L.Ed.2d 30 (2000), upon which Humana relies. In Palank, this court held that the subject indemnity agreement was irrelevant when offered by the defendant corporation in order to show that a punitive damages award would ’not have h…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw