HENDRICKS
v.
RIVERA, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

U.S. | 2000-10-02
No. 99-9815
531 U.S. 845 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • J.B. Farris v. United States, 333 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …. Butterworth, 51 F. 3d 942, 944 (11th Cir.1995). But we review the district court’s legal conclusions in a § 2255 proceeding de novo and the underlying facts for clear error. Castillo v. United States, 200 F. 3d 735, 736 (11th Cir.), cert denied, 531 U.S. 845, 121 S.Ct. 114, 148 L.Ed.2d 70 (2000). Pursuant to Rule 60(b), the district court may reheve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding based on newly discovered evidence. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(2). We have concluded, nevertheless, that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw