ALICE E. ROLAND BUSCH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY TRUST COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1931-04-28
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
101 Fla. 392 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

*397Per Curiam.

The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the decree of the court below should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Larson v. Cuesta, 120 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1941)
    …Trust Co. v. United States, 1 Cir., 110 F. 2d 887; Curtis v. Helvering, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 1014; Commissioner v. National Bank of Commerce of San Antonio, 5 Cir., 312 F. 2d 946; Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Busch v. City Trust Co., 101 Fla. 392, 134 So. 226; Van Huss v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 123 Fla. 20, 23, 165 So. 896; Arundel Debenture Corp. v. Le Blond, 139 Fla. 668; 190 So. 765; Art. 23 (k)-3 of Regulations 86, promulgated under the Revenue Act of 1934; Revenue Act of 1934,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw