HESTER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, 269 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …g forth sentencing factors relevant only to determining a defendant’s sentence for having violated § 841(a). We preserved this interpretation of § 841 even after Jones. See United States v. Hester, 199 F. 3d 1287 (11th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 531 U.S. 941, 121 S.Ct. 336, 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000). Hester represented the first serious encounter between our prior statutory interpretation and the constitutional rule of Apprendi, which at that time existed in more embryonic form as footnote six of Jones.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Alaska v. United States, 545 U.S. 75 (U.S. 2005)
  …rtain submerged lands underlying waters located in southeast Alaska. Alaska initiated the action by filing a complaint with leave of the Court. 530 U. S. 1228 (2000). We appointed Professor Gregory E. Maggs to act as Special Master in this matter. 531 U. S. 941 (2000). The Special Master gave thorough consideration to the written and oral submissions of the parties. In a detailed report he now recommends the grant of summary judgment to the United States with respect to all the submerged lands in dispute…
• United States v. Hester, 287 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …ble doubt.” 530 U.S. at 490, 120 S.Ct. at 2362-63. The Supreme Court later granted Appellant’s petition for certio-rari, vacated our opinion in this case, and remanded it to us for further consideration in light of Apprendi. Hester v. United States, 531 U.S. 941, 121 S.Ct. 336, 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000). On August 9, 2001, we entered an order on remand. Shortly thereafter, however, on August 24, 2001, we vacated the August 9, 2001, order and held this case in abeyance pending an en banc decision by this Court…