BALTODANO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2000-10-30
No. 00-6213
531 U.S. 971 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. United States, 304 F.3d 1035 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …r curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1965, 152 L.Ed.2d 1025 (2002). Unless Jones is eligible for equitable tolling, his § 2255 motion was time barred when he filed it. Akins v. United States, 204 F. 3d 1086, 1089 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 971, 121 S.Ct. 410, 148 L.Ed.2d 316 (2000). Because it is “an extraordinary remedy,” Steed, 219 F. 3d at 1300, equitable tolling has been permitted by federal courts “only sparingly,” Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96, 111 S.Ct.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw