PANDORA AVIATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Ford S. Hausman v. Bayrock Inv. Co., 530 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
  …no one would have been allowed to occupy the “shells” to install the floor coverings, walls and panels as is customarily done by tenants of such shell buildings. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Colsky, 241 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert, den., 245 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1971). This was primarily because the City Engineer for the City of Orlando prohibited such occupancy for reasons not related to the building or the site itself. Apparently, occupancy by tenants was then prohibited by the City because appellee…
• Michel E. Anderson and Roberta Anderson v. Bystrom, 520 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Metropolitan Dade County v. Colsky, 241 So. 2d 440 (Fla.3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 245 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1971).…