SHAFER

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. United Foods, Inc., 533 U.S. 405 (U.S. 2001)
  …determined the mandated payments were not part of a more comprehensive statutory program for agricultural marketing, thus dictating a different result than in Glickman. It held the assessment requirement unconstitutional, and we granted certiorari. 531 U. S. 1009 (2000). The statute in question, enacted by Congress in 1990, is the Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, 104 Stat. 3854, 7 U. S. C. § 6101 et seq. The Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a Mushroom Coun…
• Shafer v. South Carolina, 532 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2001)
• Atkinson Trading Co., Inc. v. Shirley, 532 U.S. 645 (U.S. 2001)
  …would have applied Montana without “any language or ‘factors’ derived from Merrion” and concluded that, based upon her view of the record, none of the Montana exceptions applied. 210 F. 3d, at 1269 (Briscoe, J., dissenting). We granted certiorari, 531 U.S. 1009 (2000), and now reverse. Tribal jurisdiction is limited: For powers not expressly conferred upon them by federal statute or treaty, Indian tribes [*650] must rely upon their retained or inherent sovereignty. In Montana, the most exhaustively reason…