SOURA

v.

PEPE, SUPERINTENDENT, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Citator

Cited By

• Perrine v. State, 919 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …nd after receiving Miranda warnings, was sufficiently removed from any taint.”); Holman v. Kemna, 212 F. 3d 413, 419 (8th Cir.2000) (defendant-initiated confession given morning after post-invocation of counsel questioning admissible), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1021, 121 S.Ct. 587, 148 L.Ed.2d 502 (2000); Hill v. Brigano, 199 F. 3d 833, 842 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134, 120 S.Ct. 2015, 146 L.Ed.2d 964 (2000); United States v. Thomas, 11 F. 3d 1392 (7th Cir.1993); Henderson v. Singletary, 968 F. 2…
• United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (U.S. 2008)
  …guilty to conspiracy to launder money, and the District Court sentenced him to 108 months of imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences. United States v. Febus, 218 F. 3d 784 (CA7 2000). We declined to review the case. 531 U. S. 1021 (2000). Thereafter, respondents filed motions under 28 U. S. C. § 2255, collaterally attacking their convictions and sentences. The District Court rejected all of their claims but one, a challenge to their money-laundering convictions based on the…