SUNNY SOUTH PACKING COMPANY
v.
PARKER BROTHERS, A CORP., ET AL.

Fla. | 1939-05-23
Terrell, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
138 Fla. 285 Florida Supreme Court (1939) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 189 So. 232
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision that a mortgage assignee was bound by a compromise settlement, reducing the debt from $5,500 to $1,963.39. The court found no reversible error in the lower court's ruling.


Holding

Yes, the assignee of the mortgagees was bound by the compromise settlement that adjusted the $5,500 mortgage debt to $1,963.39.


Key Quotes

“Upon pleadings and the evidence, the Chancellor found that the assignee of the mortgagees was bound by the adjustment of the $5,500.00 debt for $1,963.39”

Establishes the lower court's finding that the assignee was bound by the settlement.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff corporation, as assignee of certain mortgages, sought to enforce a mortgage for $5,500. The defense argued that a compromise settlement …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —

Per Curiam. —

In a suit by the plaintiff corporation, assignee of the mortgages, to enforce a mortgage for $5,500.00, a defense was interposed that in compromise settlement with the creditors of the mortgagor corporation on a basis of 25 °/0 of amounts due such creditors, a note for $1,965.59 was given in adjustment of the mortgage debt represented by the notes for $5,500.00,’but the noter for $5,500.00 and the note for $1,963.39 were in the possession of the assignee of the mortgagees who claimed the larger amount as due.

Upon pleadings and the evidence, the Chancellor found that the assignee of the mortgagees was bound by the adjustment of the $5,500.00 debt for $1,963.39, and there is nothing in the record to justify a reversal-of the decree for plaintiff predicated upon the lesser amount with reasonable attorney fees and costs. No material, if any, error of law or of procedure is made to’ appear.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Indian Harbor Ests., Inc. v. Wagner, 148 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)
    …ses. Clark v. Caldwell, 95 Fla. 754, 116 So. 632 (1928), Cameron v. Baker, Gieb & Schaub Motors, Inc., 96 Fla. 389, 118 So. 423 (1928), Gulf Power Co. v. Illinois-Florida Land Co., 100 Fla. 1594, 132 So. 109 (1931), and Evans v. Green, 138 Fla. 284, 189 So. 232 (1939). Ordered and decreed accordingly. CARROLL, DONALD K., C. J., and STURGIS and RAWLS, JL, concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw