TURNBULL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Paul v. Minotty, M.D., 42 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …t the Federal Wiretap Act, which prohibits the intentional interception of “any wire, oral, or electronic communication,” did not apply to silent video surveillance camera on a telephone pole outside defendant’s residence), vacated on other grounds, 531 U.S. 1033, 121 S.Ct. 621, 148 L.Ed.2d 531 (2000); United States v. Falls, 34 F. 3d 674 (8th Cir.1994) (same). Most recently, in United States v. Barios, 593 F. 3d 82 (1st Cir.2010), the First Circuit also held that silent video surveillance is not covered by…
• United States v. ROY, 761 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …the presentation of incriminating wiretap evidence. Olden v. United States, 224 F. 3d 561, 568-69 (6th Cir.2000). That did not happen here. In United States v. Patterson, 215 F. 3d 776, 783, 785-86 (7th Cir.2000), vacated in part on other grounds, 531 U.S. 1033, 121 S.Ct. 621, 148 L.Ed.2d 531 (2000), the Seventh Circuit held that an inquiry into prejudice was unnecessary when defense counsel missed a lot of the trial. And I mean a lot. He “missed seven days of [a police officer’s] testimony, four of five s…