WOODRUM
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2000-12-04
No. 00-60
531 U.S. 1035 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. United States, 304 F.3d 1035 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …now the one-year statutory limitation period because his first § 2255 motion was filed timely. Cf. Felder v. Johnson, 204 F. 3d 168, 171-73 (5th Cir.) (holding that ignorance of the law is insufficient rationale for equitable tolling), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035, 121 S.Ct. 622, 148 L.Ed.2d 532 (2000). Because the facts are the same, Jones could have timely filed both of his § 2255 motions within the one-year statutory limitation period. “[T]he fact that a statute of limitations creates certain inefficienc…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw