ALEXANDER, DIRECTOR, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL.
v.
SANDOVAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL.
ALEXANDER, DIRECTOR, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL.
SANDOVAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL.
531 U.S. 1049
Supreme Court of the United States (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Bd. OF Regents OF THE Univ. OF Ga., 263 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2001)…complaint to add a new claim of disparate impact discrimination based on Department of Education (''DOE”) regulations promulgated under § 602 of Title VI. At oral argument, Plaintiffs abandoned their appeal of that ruling. See Alexander v. Sandoval, 531 U.S. 1049, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 1516, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (holding that there is no private right of action to enforce disparate impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964, because "Title VI itself directly reaches only instances…
-
Am. Ass'n of People with Disabil. v. Smith, 227 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2002)
-
Hadsock v. Bush, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2001)