WELCH
v.
OKLAHOMA

U.S. | 2000-12-11
No. 00-6648
531 U.S. 1056 Supreme Court of the United States (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hagins v. United States, 267 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …ge was a clerical one. See United States v. Bates, 213 F. 3d 1336, 1340 (11th Cir.) (holding that, where a written judgment conflicts with the oral pronouncements of the sentencing judge, the oral pronouncement at sentencing controls), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1056, 121 S.Ct. 666, 148 L.Ed.2d 568 (2000). b. Finality of Prior Conviction Hagins also argues that his prior state conviction cannot be used to enhance his sentence because it is still not yet final. Hagins was sentenced as a first offender on 19 Febru…
  • United States v. Ridgeway, 319 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …002); United States v. Khoury, 901 F. 2d 975, 977 (11th Cir.1990). This Court reviews a district court’s imposition of a supervised release term for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Bull, 214 F. 3d 1275, 1277-78 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1056, 121 S.Ct. 667, 148 L.Ed.2d 568 (2000). A district court may impose conditions of supervised release in accordance with four classes of conditions found in U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3. The first class of supervised re lease conditions is the list of “mandator…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw