KNOWLTON

v.

BRANSFORD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (U.S. 2006)
  …at have interpreted § 704(a) in this way state that it requires a materially adverse employment action. See, e. g., Von Gunten v. Maryland, 243 F. 3d 858, 865 (CA4 2001); Gupta v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 212 F. 3d 571, 587 (CA11 2000), cert. denied, 531 U. S. 1076 (2001); Robinson v. Pittsburgh, 120 F. 3d 1286, 1300 (CA3 1997). In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U. S. 742, 761-762 (1998), we “import[ed]” this test for use in a different context—to define the term “tangible employment action,” a co…
• Griffin v. City OF Opa-Locka, 261 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …the sexual harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of employment and create a discriminatory abusive working environment. Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents, 212 F. 3d 571, 582 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1076, 121 S.Ct. 772, 148 L.Ed.2d 671 (2001). Our discussion in previous sections of the opinion leaves little doubt as to our belief whether Neal’s sexual harassment of Griffin was sufficiently severe or pervasive to constitute a hostile working enviro…
• Shannon v. Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc., 292 F.3d 712 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …a motion for judgment as a matter of law, and, in applying the same standard as the district court, we view all facts in the fight most favorable to the nonmoving party. Gupta v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 212 F. 3d 571, 582 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1076, 121 S.Ct. 772, 148 L.Ed.2d 671 (2001). The .jury’s verdict must stand unless “there is no legally sufficient eviden-tiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a)(1). It is the jury’s task—not ours— “to…