BECKER
v.
MONTGOMERY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO, ET AL.

U.S. | 2001-01-16
No. 00-6374
531 U.S. 1110 Supreme Court of the United States (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757 (U.S. 2001)
    …ide the time allowed to file the notice. We granted review to address this question: “When a party files a timely notice of appeal in district court, does the failure to sign the notice of appeal require the court of appeals to dismiss the appeal?” 531 U.S. 1110 (2001). Our answer is no. For want of a signature on a timely notice, the appeal is not automatically lost. The governing Federal Rules direct that the notice of appeal, like other papers filed in district court, shall be signed by counsel or, if th…
    1 / 3

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw