MICHAEL BODNEY, APPELLANT,
v.
MARIE LEONNE BODNEY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-04-06
No. 70-914
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-
246 So. 2d 578 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, former husband of appellee, appeals an amended final judgment of divorce in which the court approved and adopted a stipulation made in open court relating to alimony and homestead property. It is urged that the record does not affirmatively show that appellant agreed to the stipulation. We think this position is without merit in view of appellant’s presence in court, his apparent understanding of this agreement and the agreement of his counsel on his behalf. See Peters v. Spielvogel, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 59; Dunscombe v. Smith, 139 Fla. 497, 190 So. 796 (1939).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw