SOWELL
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2001-02-20
No. 00-7755
531 U.S. 1175 Supreme Court of the United States (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. United States, 396 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. 2005)
    …F. 3d 448, 451-52 (6th Cir.2001); United States v. Cockerham, 237 F. 3d 1179, 1183-87 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1085, 122 S.Ct. 821, 151 L.Ed.2d 703 (2002); Mason v. United States, 211 F. 3d 1065, 1069-70 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1175, 121 S.Ct. 1148, 148 L.Ed.2d 1010 (2001). We are persuaded by the foregoing consistent line of authority from our sister Circuits on this issue, particularly since a contrary result would permit a defendant to circumvent the terms of the sentence-…
  • United States v. Morales-Castillo, 314 F.3d 561 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …her Application Note 6 imposes a mandatory obligation on the district courts. Compare United States v. Goldman, 228 F. 3d 942, 944 (8th Cir.2000) (holding that Application Note 6 imposes a mandatory obligation on the district courts), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1175, 121 S.Ct 1149, 148 L.Ed.2d 1011 (2001); United States v. Alexander, 100 F. 3d 24, 26-27 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1128, 117 S.Ct. 1273, 137 L.Ed.2d 350 (1997) (same); United States v. Gondek, 65 F. 3d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1995) (same); Unit…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw