GANN
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.; STEADMAN V. UNITED STATES; GYADU V. CONNECTICUT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION; CHAMBERS V. WELBORN, WARDEN; FERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; GIBSON V. PRUITT, WARDEN, ET AL.; TELFAIR V. FIRST UNION MORTGAGE CORP.; POLYAK V. BURSON ET AL.; TURNER V. WARNER BROTHERS STUDIO ET AL.; BONTON V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ET AL.; SIAS V. LEBLANC, WARDEN, IN RE REYNA, CAMILO BRAVO V. UNITED STATES; FLOREZ V. UNITED STATES; CHILDS V. SUTHERS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; BAKER V. UNITED STATES; MARIN V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; EVANS V. PRICE; HEADRICK V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; BOLDEN V. VILLAGE OF BELLWOOD; MOODY V. OKORIE; BRAKEALL V. GURUCHARRI ET AL.; ROBLYER V. PENNSYLVANIA; BENNETT V. LAKE HAVASU CITY, ARIZONA, ET AL.; BIRDWELL V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; BRAVO V. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.; MCCAULEY V. COOK'S PEST CONTROL, INC., ET AL.; LOVE V. TESSMER, WARDEN; REYNOLDS V. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SPIVEY V. HEAD, WARDEN; WILSON V. PHILLIPS, WARDEN; DE SPENZA V. CAMBRA, WARDEN, ET AL.; LLOYD V. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; LEE V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; BYRD V. COLLINS, WARDEN; THOMPSON V. BRANCHES-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, INC., ET AL.; HOBBY V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS; SIMPKINS V. UNITED STATES; MANLEY V. MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ET AL.; HARRISON V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ET AL.; CRAWFORD V. UNITED STATES; FIELDS V. TYSON FOODS ET AL.; AYERS V. SPARKMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES; ABE V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES; RHUDY V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This Supreme Court order issued on February 20, 2001, denies petitions for rehearing in thirty-five consolidated cases involving various federal and state law disputes, including constitutional claims by prisoners, employment matters, and administrative appeals. The Court's brief order references prior decisions and case numbers without providing substantive legal analysis, indicating that the Court declined to reconsider its previous rulings on these matters.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
529 U. S. 1090; 529 U. S. 1076; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 1073; ante, p. 1074; ante, p. 1075; ante, p. 1052; ante, p. 884; ante, p. 810; ante, p. 994; ante, p. 898; ante, p. 905; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 961; No. 00-5838. No. 00-5844. No. 00-5880. No. 00-5907. No. 00-5982. No. 00-6046. No. 00-6080. No. 00-6084. No. 00-6193. No. 00-6243. No. 00-6349. No. 00-6359. No. 00-6389. No. 00-6418. No. 00-6458. No. 00-6476. No. 00-6477. No. 00-6484. No. 00-6494. No. 00-6527. No. 00-6541. No. 00-6657. No. 00-6690. No. 00-6753. No. 00-6837. No. 00-6852. ante, p. 963; ante, p. 1016; ante, p. 964; ante, p. 965; ante, p. 1016; ante, p. 981; ante, p. 995; ante, p. 995; ante, p. 1016; ante, p. 1017; ante, p. 1038; ante, p. 998; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1039; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1054;. ante, p. 999; ante, p. 1082; ante, p. 1055; ante, p. 1022; ante, p. 1024; ante, p. 1085; ante, p. 1056; ante, p. 1042; ante, p. 1089; No. 00-6948. No. 00-6997. No. 00-7030. No. 00-7123. ante, p. 1092; ante, p. 1057; ante, p. 1094; and ante, p. 1097. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Leone v. Kerley, 529 U.S. 1076 (U.S. 2000)
- Miller v. Davis-Morrell, 529 U.S. 1076 (U.S. 2000)
- Townsend v. Oklahoma, 529 U.S. 1090 (U.S. 2000)
- Johnson v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 1090 (U.S. 2000)