KING

v.

UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2001-02-26

No. 00-6900

531 U.S. 1193 Supreme Court of the United States (2001) Positive Treatment

Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

In re Workman, 532 U.S. 954 (U.S. 2001)

…petitioner’s applications for relief in February, I was persuaded that those claims were sufficiently serious to require a foil evidentiary hearing before a factfinder. The majority of the Court, however, did not share that opinion. Workman v. Bell, 531 U.S. 1193. I remain of the view that such [*955] a hearing should be held, but acknowledge that the issue is effectively foreclosed by the action that the Court took in February.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw