HELEN MCMAHON, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT D. HUNTINGTON AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In a workers' compensation case, the Florida Supreme Court held that a judge properly determined the claimant had reached maximum medical recovery based on her ankle fracture healing and evidence that further employment would be the best treatment for her accompanying anxiety disorder. The court reversed the Industrial Relations Commission and reinstated the workers' compensation award, including compensation for nursing services provided by the claimant's sister.
The court held that the Judge properly determined maximum medical recovery based on competent evidence showing the claimant's ankle healed and employment would alleviate her psychological condition. The court also held that compensation for nursing services was properly awarded because the nature of the injury and claimant's age indicated necessity, confirmed by a treating physician's statement that assistance would be needed for a few weeks after hospital discharge.
[1] A claimant may reach maximum medical recovery even if a psychological reaction to an injury lingers, if resuming work is deemed the best treatment for that reaction.
[2] The ability of a claimant to resume work can be a significant factor in determining maximum medical recovery, particularly when employment is considered therapeutic for p…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The singular interrelationship between claimant's psychiatric disability and her ability to resume work takes this case out of the situations obtaining in Chastain v. Union News Division of American News Co., 194 So. 2d 899 (Fla.1966) [relied upon by the Commission majority], and Moses v. R. H. Wright & Son, Inc., 90 So. 2d 330 (Fla.1956).”
The court's explanation for why the case differed from precedent allowing reversal of the maximum medical recovery determination.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHelen McMahon, a 59-year-old chambermaid, suffered a compensable left ankle fracture. Her ankle healed without serious physical complication; however,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Maximum Medical Recovery cases and more on FLexlaw
Two substantive issues are presented to us in this workmen’s compensation case: first, did the Judge of Industrial Claims err in finding that claimant had reached maximum medical recovery; second, was the grant of compensation for nursing services proper. The Industrial Relations Commission reversed the Judge’s affirmative rulings on both issues with one member dissenting. In our judgment the reversal was in error and the Compensation Order should have been sustained.
Claimant, a 59-year old woman employed as a chambermaid, fractured her left ankle in a compensable accident. Her injuries healed without serious physical complication to the point of maximum medical recovery, but the accident set off an adverse psychological reaction, known as a chronic anxiety reaction, which lingered on even as her ankle healed. At the hearing on her claim, an examining physician testified that this reaction would suggest further psychiatric treatment, but that the best treatment would be for claimant to begin working again. In his view, employment would alleviate an intense fear of dependency which formed the basis for her anxiety reaction. Considering the testimony that claimant was able to resume work, and that work would be the best remedy for her ills, we believe that the Claims Judge could make a determination of maximum medical recovery based on competent, substantial evidence in accord with logic and reason. The singular interrelationship between claimant’s psychiatric disability and her ability to resume work takes this case out of the situations obtaining in Chastain v. Union News Division of American News Co., 194 So.2d 899 (Fla.1966) [relied upon by the Commission majority], and Moses v. R. H. Wright & Son, Inc., 90 So.2d 330 (Fla.1956).
We also find that an award for practical nursing services rendered by claimant’s sister was properly made. See Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Weaver, 226 So.2d 801 (Fla.1969), for a discussion of services which are compensa-ble. In this case, the nature of the injury and the age of the claimant indicated that the services would be necessary; this was confirmed by correspondence from one of the treating physicians in which he stated that claimant “[W]ould need assistance for few weeks after getting out of the hospital.” The services rendered were compen-sable under Fla.Stat. § 440.13(1), F.S.A.
Accordingly, certiorari is granted, the Order of the Industrial Relations Commission is quashed, and the cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the Order of the Judge of Industrial Claims.
Petitioner-claimant’s petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the amount of $500.00.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Abner Sweeting v. Cohen-Ager, Inc., 257 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1972)…nd that it would probably disappear on the claimant’s return to work. Accordingly, we must affirm.” In our opinion, the recent decision of this Court, speaking through Justice Carlton, in McMahon v. Huntington and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 246 So. 2d 743 (Fla.1971) (rendered subsequent to the order of the full Commission sought to be reviewed) is dispositive of the issue presented. In that case, in which claimant was also suffering from an anxiety reaction, we reversed an order of the full Commissio…
Authorities Cited
- PAN Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Weaver, 226 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 1969)
- Millard M. Moses v. R. H. Wright & SON, Inc., 90 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1956)
- Chastain v. Union News Div. OF the Am. News Co. & Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 194 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1966)