COOK

v.

DORMIRE, SUPERINTENDENT, JEFFERSON CITY CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Citator

Cited By

• TRW Inc. v. Andrews, 534 U.S. 19 (U.S. 2001)
  …69 (CA10 1995); Rylewicz v. Beaton Servs., Ltd., 888 F. 2d 1175 (CA7 1989); Houghton v. Insurance Crime Prevention Institute, 795 F. 2d 322 (CA3 1986); Clay v. Equifax, Inc., 762 F. 2d 952 (CA11 1985). We granted certiorari to resolve this conflict, 532 U. S. 902 (2001), and now reverse. [*27] II The Court of Appeals rested its decision on the premise that all federal statutes of limitations, regardless of context, incorporate a general discovery rule “unless Congress has expressly legislated otherwise.” 22…
• Corr. Servs. Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (U.S. 2001)
  …deleted)). But the court reasoned that private entities like CSC should be held liable under Bivens to “accomplish the . . . important Bivens goal of providing a remedy for constitutional violations.” 229 F. 3d, at 380. [*66] We granted certiorari, 532 U. S. 902 (2001), and now reverse.2 In Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), we recognized for the first time an implied private action for damages against federal officers alleged to have violated a citizen’s constitutional righ…
• City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (U.S. 2002)
  …ate that its regulation of multiple-use establishments is “designed to serve” the city’s substantial interest in reducing crime. The challenged ordinance was therefore invalid under Renton, 475 U. S. 41. 222 F. 3d, at 723-724. We granted certiorari, 532 U. S. 902 (2001), to clarify the standard for determining whether an ordinance serves a substantial government interest under Renton, supra. II In Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., supra, this Court considered the validity of a municipal ordinance that pro…