MATHIAS ET AL.

v.

WORLDCOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Verizon Md. Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Md., 535 U.S. 635 (U.S. 2002)
  …efendants. Both Verizon and the United [*641] States, an intervenor below, petitioned this Court for review of the four questions resolved by the Fourth Circuit. Because we had previously granted certiorari in Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc., 532 U. S. 903 (2001), which raised all but the question whether § 1331 provides a basis for jurisdiction, we granted certiorari only on the §1331 question and set the case for oral argument in tandem with Mathias. 533 U. S. 928 (2001). After oral argument, for re…
• Verizon Md. Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Md., 534 U.S. 1072 (U.S. 2001)
  …C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 533 U. S. 928.] The petitions for certiorari in these cases presented the same questions at issue in No. 00-878, Mathias et al v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc., et al. [certiorari granted, 532 U. S. 903], plus the additional question of subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1331. We granted certiorari only on the additional question, and held the other questions pending their resolution in Mathias, supra. Oral argument has revealed, howe…
• Mathias v. Worldcom Techs., Inc., 535 U.S. 682 (U.S. 2002)
  …-104, 110 Stat. 56; and (3) whether the doctrine of Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123 (1908), permits suit for prospective relief against state public utility commissioners in their official capacities for. alleged [*684] ongoing violations of that Act. 532 U. S. 903 (2001). After full briefing and oral argument, it is now clear that petitioners were the prevailing parties below, and seek review of uncongenial findings not essential to the judgment and not binding upon them in future litigation. As a general rul…