DILLARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. United States, 304 F.3d 1035 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …ule is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c). . Pruitt v. United States, 274 F. 3d 1315 (11th Cir.2001) (per curiam); Mederos v. United States, 218 F. 3d 1252 (11th Cir.2000); Davenport v. United States, 217 F. 3d 1341 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 907, 121 S.Ct. 1232, 149 L.Ed.2d 141 (2001). Petitioner’s Brief at 16-18. . We further note that, because this § 2255 motion was not filed until after Jones's other § 2255 motion had been answered by the government, decided by the district court, and…
• J.B. Farris v. United States, 333 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …ersal would result in a “substantially lower sentence.” We review a district court’s denial of a request for leave to amend a § 2255 motion for abuse of discretion. Davenport v. United States, 217 F. 3d 1341, 1343 n. 4 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 907, 121 S.Ct. 1232, 149 L.Ed.2d 141 (2001). A federal prisoner may file a § 2255 motion “upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose…
• Melson v. Allen, 548 F.3d 993 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and the Alabama Supreme Court. See id. at 904; Ex Parte Melson, 775 So. 2d 904, 908 (Ala.2000). The United States Supreme Court denied Melson’s petition for writ of certio-rari on 5 March 2001. Melson v. Alabama, 532 U.S. 907, 121 S.Ct. 1233, 149 L.Ed.2d 141 (2001). The following timeline is relevant to the outcome of this case: 4 Mar. 2002 Melson, through counsel, filed an unverified Rule 32 petition, challenging his convictions. 12 Mar. 2002 The state filed a motion t…