DAVID G. BOGLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID G. BOGLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
247 So. 2d 13
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on authority of Cross v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 324, and Hunt v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 212.
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Steinhauer v. Lossie S. Steinhauer, 252 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…ced wife’s ability to be employed and earn a living, the needs of the wife and the children and the husband’s capacity to meet such needs are all relevant material factors in determining the wife’s need for alimony. McGarry v. McGarry, Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 13; Brown v. Brown, Fla.1965, 84 So. 2d 311; Platt v. Platt, Fla.App. 1958, 103 So. 2d 253; see also 10 Fla.Jur., Divorce, pp. 569-571. In the case sub judice, the court specifically found that the wife’s income and assets presently exceeded those of t…
-
Kennedy v. Kennedy, 303 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1974)…essarily compel an award which maintains the pre-di-vorce standard of living for the wife. The wife’s age and potential for employment are relevant factors which may be considered in assessing her need for alimony. McGarry v. McGarry, Fla.App. 1971, 247 So. 2d 13. Lump sum alimony may be awarded to the wife instead of permanent periodic alimony where a lump sum award is justified for rehabilitative purposes. Calligarich v. Calligarich, supra. A lump sum award may be used, in other words, to tide the wife ove…
-
McREE v. McREE, 267 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)…ecessarily compel an award which maintains the pre-divorce standard of living for the wife. The wife’s age and potential for employment are relevant factors which may be considered in assessing her need for alimony. McGarry v. McGarry, Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 13. Lump sum alimony may be awarded to the wife instead of permanent periodic alimony where a lump sum award is justified for rehabilitative purposes. Calligarich v. Calligarich, supra. A lump sum award may be used, in other words, to tide the wife ove…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hunt v. State, 200 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Cross v. State, 237 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)